|
A
Warner Brothers, Alexander Salkind
Production, 1980. Story by Mario Puzo.
Screenplay by Mario Puzo, David
Newman III and Leslie Newman.
Directed by Richard Lester and
Richard Donner (uncredited).
Starring Gene Hackman, Christopher
Reeve, Margot Kidder, Terence Stamp,
Sarah Douglas and Jack O'Halloran.
|
|
By Stephen Pytak
Of the four "Superman" films which starred Christopher
Reeve, it was the last to deliver the goods. The money men and the screenwriters pushed
"The Man of Steel" to his limits emotionally and
physically with a cool story and three nasty villains
from Krypton. The special effects are dated. But the movie -- made up of material shot by directors
Richard Donner and Richard Lester -- is very watchable. The worst line in the film is the one we see when
the credits start to roll: "Coming Soon: Superman
III." I hate over confidence. To get an education about the making of this
film, I really suggest one and all get a hold of the
DVD release of "Superman (1978)" and "Superman II:
The Donner Cut" and listen carefully to the
commentaries with the original's director, Richard
Donner, and creative consultant, Tom Mankiewicz.
Or pick up Jake Rossen's 2008 book "Superman vs.
Hollywood." Turns out "Superman" and "Superman II" were
filmed simultaneously and, Mankiewicz alleges
that Donner directed 90-percent of the latter. When the original became a success, the
producers, for whatever reason, fired Donner and
brought in Richard Lester to finish the sequel. Margot Kidder said in one of the making-of
specials on that disc that she and many cast
members weren't inspired by the decision. Lester directed "A Hard Day's Night (1964)"
and "The Three Musketeers (1973.) And, it's hard
to tell exactly what he did on "Superman II." He went on to direct "Superman III (1983)."
But that's not why you're reading this. "Superman II" had a tough act to follow. Donner said the ending where "Superman"
turns back the world to save Lois Lane was
supposed to be the climax of the sequel. But the
creators decided to put it on the end of the of the
original. It's quite a punctuation. I don't think any super-
hero movie will ever top it. But there were other dilemmas. In the original "Superman" script, one of
"Luthor's" rockets, sent into space by "Superman,"
was supposed to be the key to unlock "The
Phantom Zone." That thread is still suggested in "Superman II."
You'll hear it during the scene when Luthor and
"Miss Teschmacher (Valerie Perrine)" sneak into
The Fortress of Solitude. They play with some
crystals and hear a message from Superman's
mother, "Lara (Susanna York)." "The Phantom Zone might be cracked by a
nuclear explosion in space," she says. But in the film, a hydrogen bomb "Superman"
launches from Paris does the job. "Superman II" is hard to dislike because of
some interesting twists and turns, fine
performances and humor. It wouldn't have worked at all if it wasn't for
Reeve. This time out, he plays three versions of
himself, all interesting. First there's his "Clark Kent," who personifies
innocence by claiming to read Dickens instead of
watching TV. This is comic genius. Then, there's his "Superman," confident and
dead on. No one flies better. On top of that, we see a vulnerable third side,
the human who's in love with Lois Lane, the
weakling who can't live without the red and blue
tights. The shot of Reeve taking that long walk back in
the snow to beg for his powers back will always
stick with me. "General Zod," Ursa" and "Non," meanwhile,
are just plain fun to watch. Their attack on The White House isn't as
colorful as "Nightcrawler's" in "X2: X-Men United
(2003)." But their confrontation with the
"President (E.G. Marshall)" is hard to beat. It's played dead serious. There's an atmosphere
of genuine dread which makes us anticipate a
showdown. That showdown, as many of the posters billed,
is the battle between the villains from Krypton and
"The Son of Jor-El" in Metropolis. The special effects are just O.K. but there are
some highlights. I love it when "Ursa (Sarah Douglas)" kicks up
a sewer lid and throws it like a Frisbee. Then there's the bus toss. I don't know how they did this. I doubt it was
with miniatures. But, on Reeve's end, it looks like
it hurt. If directed today, the battle would have been a
little more extreme, akin to the efforts of Roland
Emmerich or Michael Bay. The ending isn't the greatest and it's the reason
why I'm not giving "Superman II" the gold. Personally, I thought the writers could have
turned up the heat a bit more on "General Zod,"
"Ursa" and "Non." I know it was a PG flick. But, for God's sake,
they killed astronauts, wreaked The White House
and no doubt left a body or two in front of that
Kentucky Fried Chicken house in Metropolis. A broken hand, a toss into the white abyss and
a punch from Lois just wasn't enough. Maybe "Superman" should have picked them
up by the legs and gave them a 350-mile-an-hour
launch back into space. But any problem with the storyline is easily
forgotten when you hear a line or two from Gene
Hackman, who's "Lex Luthor" saves the day more
than once here. I love it when he looks at his pocket watch in
the middle of everything and says "I never thought
this thing would go the distance." Not everything does.
Fans of the film should also check out the "Donner
Cut" released on DVD by Warner Bros. in 2006. While
patched together with auditon tapes and some of Lester's
scenes, it's fun and Donner and Mankiewicz give an
insightful commentary.
There are a lot of alternative scenes and new directions,
a lot I like more than choices made in the theatrical cut.
There's an alternative scene of Luthor and Teschmacher
in the Fortress of Solitude. After playing with some crystals,
they unlock a hologram of Brando's "Jor-El." After putting
two and two together, Luthor yells: "ARE YOU
THE OL' MAN!"
Notice what Lois is wearing after hours in the Fortress,
Superman's shirt. That is a heck of a nice touch.
In its current incarnation, I have to give the Donner cut
the same rating as the theatrical, basically four stars out of
five.
But if I was the hand of God, I would have had
Donner finish this film back in 1979 to give us something
that would have no doubt scored a five out of five.
|
|